Physiological basis for lithokinetic therapy. Part 2


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Conservative treatment of ureteral stones remains an important component of the management of patients with urolithiasis. despite the widespread introduction of minimally invasive technologies for surgical removal of stones in clinical practice, the use of conservative effects aimed at ensuring maximum conditions for independent passage of stones from the upper urinary tract (UUT) is considered by the urological community as an integral part of complex treatment. With the accumulation of knowledge about the molecular-biochemical characteristics of the physiology of ureteral smooth muscle cells, the determination of the role of impaired UUT urodynamics and inflammation factors, it became possible to assess ways to solve the problem of spontaneous discharge of stones.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V Dutov

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute

Email: valeriy.dutov.52@mail.ru
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Urology of FCME, Chief Researcher Moscow, Russia

D. M Popov

Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital

Email: surgeon67@yandex.ru
PhD in Medical Sciences, Doctor At the Urology Department, Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital Moscow, Russia

S. V Dutov

D.D. Pletnev City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: hammerwise@gmail.com
PhD in Medical Sciences, Doctor at the Urology Department № 2 Moscow, Russia

A. A Rumyantsev

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute; Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital

Email: rumyancevuro@mail.ru
PhD in Medical Sciences, Head of the Urology Department, Zhukovsky City Clinical Hospital;, Associate Professor at the Department of Urology FCME, M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute Moscow, Russia

A. A Podoynitsyn

Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute

Email: a9251252261@gmail.com
PhD in Medical Sciences, Teaching Assistant at the Department of Urology FCME, Deputy Chief Physician Moscow, Russia

S. Yu Buymister

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute

Email: svetlanabuymistr@mail.ru
Postgraduate Student at the Department of Urology Moscow, Russia

V. S Goncharuk

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute

Email: goncharuk.vitalii@inbox.ru
Postgraduate Student at the Department of Urology Moscow, Russia

M. T.S Dadashov

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute

Email: tagidadashov@gmail.com
Clinical Resident at the Department of Urology Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Дутов В.В., Попов Д.М., Подойницын А.А. и др. Физиологические основы литокинетической терапии. Клин. нефрология. 2019;3(11):63-69
  2. TUrk C. (Chair), Neisius A., Petrik A., et al. EAU Guidelines. 2020.
  3. Backlund L. Experimental studies on pressure and contractility in the ureter. Acta Physiol. Scand.1963;(1):1-86.
  4. Chapple C.R., Wyndaele J.J., Nordling J., et al, For the European Tamsulosin Study Group. Tamsulosin, the first prostate-selective a1A-adrenoceptor antagonist. Eur. Urol. 1996;29:155-167.
  5. Gandolpho L, Sevillano M., Bardieri A., et al. Scintigraphy and Dopier ultrasonography for the evaluation of obstructive urinary calculi. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2001;34(6):745-751.
  6. Constantinou C.E., Yamaguchi O. Multiple-coupled pacemaker system in renal pelvis of the unicalyceal kidney. Am. J. Physiol. 1981;241:412-417.
  7. Chuang Y.H., Chuang W.L., Huang S.P., et al. The temporal relationship between the severity of hydroureter and the dynamic changes of obstructed ureters in a rat model. B.J.U. 1995;76:303-310.
  8. Kampa R.J., Ghani K.R., Wahed S. Size matters: A survey of how urinary-tract stones are measured in the UK. J. Endourol. 2005;19:856-860.
  9. Biancani P., Hausman M., Weiss R.M. Effect of obstruction on ureteral circumferential force-length relations. Am. J. Physiol. 1982;243:204-209.
  10. Resim S., Ekerbicer H., Ciftci A. Effect of tamsulosin on the number and intensity of ureteral colic in patients with lower ureteral calculus. Int. J. Urol. 2005;12:615-620.
  11. Dixon J.S., Gosling J.A. The musculature ofthe human renal calices, pelvis and upper ureter. J. Anatomy. 1973;135:129-137.
  12. Белый Л.Е. Нарушения уродинамики при острой обструкции верхних мочевых путей. Средневолжский научный центр. 2003. 35 с.
  13. Allen J.T., Vaughan Jr. E.D., Gillenwater J.Y. The effect of indomethacin on renal blood flow and ureteral pressure in unilateral ureteral obstruction in awake dogs. Invest. Urol. 1978;15:324-327.
  14. Ahmad M., Chaughtai M.N., Khan F.A. Role of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors in the passage of ureteric calculus. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 1991;41:268.
  15. Djurhuus J.C., Constantinou C.E. Chronic ureteric obstruction and its impact on the coordinating mechanisms of peristalsis (pyelouretericpacemaker system). Urol. Res. 1982;10:267-270.
  16. Forman A., Andersson K.E., Henriksson I. Effects of nifedipine on the smooth muscle of the human urinary tract in vitro and in vivo. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. (Copenh). 1978;43:111-118.
  17. Yamaguchi K., Minei S., Yamazaki T., et al. Characterization of ureteral lesions associated with impacted stones. Int. J. Urol. 1999;6:281-285.
  18. Marshall S., Lyon R.P., Minkler D. Ureteral dilatation following use of oral contraceptives. JAMA. 1966;198:782-783.
  19. Stenberg, Olsen P.R., Engstrand A., Perrson A.E.G. Pressure and flow measurement in the partion obstructed ureter. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1988;22:279-281.
  20. Vaughan Jr. E.D., Shenasky II J.H., Gillenwater J.Y. Mechanism of acute hemodynamic response to ureteral occlusion. Invest. Urol. 1971;9:109-112.
  21. Gaudio K.M., Siegel N.J., Hayslett J.P. Renal perfusion and intratubular pressure during ureteral occlusion in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1980;238:205-209.
  22. Harris K.P.G., Schreiner G.F., Klahr S. Effect of leukocyte depletion on the function of the postobstructed kidney. Kidney Int. 1989;36:210-215.
  23. Пытель Ю.А., Борисов В.А., Симонов В.А.Физиология человека. Мочевые пути. М., 1992;145-156.
  24. Ammons W.S. Bowditch Lecture. Renal afferent inputs to ascending spinal pathways. Am. J. Physiol. 1992;262:165.
  25. Kuрпатовский В.И., Мудрая И.С. Варианты нарушений функции верхних мочевых путей при мочекаменной болезни. Урология. 1998;3:21-25.
  26. Мудрая И.С. Функциональное состояние верхних мочевых путей при урологических заболеваниях. Дисс. докт. мед. наук. 2002.
  27. Cronan J.J., Tublin M.E. Role of renal resistive index in the evaluation of acute renal obstruction. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1995;164:377-378
  28. Edyvane K.A., Smet P.J., Trussed D.C. Patterns of neuronal colocalisation of tyrosine hydroxylase, neuropeptide Y, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in human ureter. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 1994;48:241-244.
  29. Griffiths D.J. The mechanics of urine transport in the upper urinary tract. 2. The discharge of the bolus into the bladder and dynamics at high rates of flow. Neurourol. Urodyn. 1983;l.2:167-177.
  30. Backlund L, Reuterskiold A.G. Activity in the dilated dog ureter. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1969;3:99-102.
  31. Backlund L, Reuterskiold A.G. The abnormal ureter in children. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1969;3:219-225.
  32. Biancani P, Zabinski M.P., Weiss R.M. Time course of ureteral changes with acute and chronic obstruction. Am. J. Physiol. 1976;231:393-395.
  33. Christianssen P., Harving N. Pelviometry in the normal and the partial obstructed porcine kidney: recording before and after three weeks after application of ureteral obstruction. J. Urol. 1988;140(4):848-852.
  34. Паникратов К.Д. Динамика функциональных расстройств верхних мочевых путей. Урология и нефрология. 1975;5:3-7.
  35. Паникратов К.Д. Хронические нарушения уродинамики верхних мочевых путей. Иваново. Талка. 1992. 272 с
  36. Gasser H.S., Grundfest H. Axon diameters in relation to the spike dimensions and the conduction velocity in mammalian A-fibers. Amer. J. Physiol. 1939;127:393-397.
  37. Lang R.J., Tonta M.A., Beata Z., et al. Pyelouretericperistalsis: role of atypical smooth muscle cells and interstitial cells of Cajal-like cells as pacemakers. J. Physiol. 2006;576:695-705.
  38. Cronan J.J., Tublin M.E. Role of renal resistive index in the evaluation of acute renal obstruction. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1995;164:377-378.
  39. Sahin A., Erdemli I., Bakkaloglu M., et al. The effect of nifedipine and verapamil on rhythmic contractions of human isolated ureter. Arch. Int. Physiol. Biochim. Biophys. 1993;101:245-247.
  40. Santis W.F., Sullivan M.P., Gobet R. Characterization of ureteral dysfunction in an experimental model of congenital bladder outlet obstruction. J. Urol. 2000;163:980-985.
  41. Roberts J.A. Experimental pyelonephritis in the monkey. III. Pathophysiology of ureteral malfunction induced by bacteria. Invest. Urol. 1975;13:117-123.
  42. King W.W., Cox C.E. Bacterial inhibition of ureteral smooth muscle contractility. I. The effect of common urinary pathogens and endotoxin in an in vitro system. J. Urol. 1972;108:700- 705.
  43. Thulesius O., Araj G. The effect of uropathogenic bacteria on ureteral motility. Urol. Res. 1987;15:273-276.
  44. Mandel N., et al. Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes. J. Urol. 2003;169:2026-2031.
  45. Kourambas J., et al. Role of stone analysis in metabolic evaluation and medical treatment of nephrolithiasis. J. Endourol. 2001;15:181-185.
  46. Dellabella M., et al. Medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureterolithiasis: randomized prospective study on role of corticosteroids used in combination with tamsulosin-simplified treatment regimen and health-related quality of life. Urology. 2005;66:712-716.
  47. Hubner W.A., Irby P., Stoller M.L. Natural history and current concepts for the treatment of small ureteral calculi. Eur. Urol. 1993;24: 172-176.
  48. Segura J.W., Preminger G.M., Assimos D.G. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. American Urological Association. J. Urol. 1997;158:1915-1921.
  49. Miller O.F., Kane C.J. Time to Stone Passage for Observed Ureteral Calculi: A Guide for Patient Education. J. Urol. 1999;162:688-91.
  50. Whiteield H.N., Britton K.E., Fry I.K., et al. The obstructed kidney: correlation between renal function and urodynamic assessement. British J. Urol. 1977;49(7):615-619.
  51. Ibrahim A.I.A., Shetty S.D., Awad R.M., Patel K.P. Prognostic factors in the conservative treatment of ureteric stones. Br. J. Urol. 1991;67:358-362.
  52. Irving S.O., Calleja R., Lee F., et al. Is the conservative management of ureteric calculi of >4 mm safe? B. J. Urol. Int. 2000;85:6 37-640.
  53. Crowley A.R., Byrne J.C., Vaughan Jr. E.D., Marion D.N. The effect of acute obstruction on ureteral function. J. Urol. 1990;143:596-599.
  54. Laird J.M., Roza C., Cervero F. Effects of artificial calculosis on rat ureter motility: Peripheral contribution to the pain of ureteric colic. Am. J. Physiol. 1997;272:1409-1412.
  55. Lindsey D., Parker D.A., Arganese T. Modification by dipyrone (noramidopy-rine methanesulphonate) of stone-induced ureteric hyperperistalsis in the dog. Urol. Res. 1979;7:13-17.
  56. Sivula A., Lehtonen T. Spontaneous passage of artificial concretions applied in the rabbit ureter. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1967;1:259-236.
  57. Miyatake R., Tomiyama Y., Murakami M., et al. Effects of isoproterenol and butylscopolamine on the friction between an artificial stone and the intraureteral wall in anesthetized rabbits. J. Urol. 2001;166:1083-1087.
  58. Lotan Y., Gettman M.T., Roehrborn C.G., et al. Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J. Urol. 2002;167:1621-1624.
  59. Vereecken R.L. The physiology and pathophysiology of the ureter. Eur. Urol. 1976;2(1):4-7.
  60. Lee B.R., Silver R.J., Partin A.W. A quantitative histologic analysis of collagen subtypes: The primary obstructed and refluxing megaureter of childhood. Urology. 1998;51:820-825.
  61. Kaid-Omar Z., Belouatek A., Driouch A., et al. Effects of diuretic therapy on spontaneous expulsion of urinary calculi, urinary pH, and crystalluria in lithi-asic patients. Prog. Urol. 2001;11:450-454.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download