<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гинекология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2079-5696</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2079-5831</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">28476</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Tolerability and patient satisfaction using different intrauterine contraceptive: results of the observation program MIRABEL</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Переносимость и степень удовлетворенности пациенток при использовании различных внутриматочных контрацептивов: результаты наблюдательной программы МИРАБЕЛЬ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Andreeva</surname><given-names>E N</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Андреева</surname><given-names>Елена Николаевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, проф., зав. отд-нием ФГБУ ЭНЦ</p></bio><email>gynec@endocrincentr.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Endocrinology research center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ Эндокринологический научный центр Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2015-10-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>10</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 17, NO5 (2015)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 17, №5 (2015)</issue-title><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-04-09"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2015, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2015, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/28476">https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/28476</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The high incidence of unintended pregnancy remains a significant problem in many countries, including Russia. This figure can be significantly reduced when using reversible contraceptive methods for a long-acting, which include intrauterine levonorgestrel - therapeutic hormonal system and copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive means. Intrauterine remedies are highly assessed and effective, being characterized by a small number of contraindications and side effects with long-term economic viability application and can be a good choise for most women. The article presents the results of a multicenter non-interventional prospective comparative observational program, the main aim of which was to examine the tolerability of intrauterine and patient satisfaction results of their application.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Высокая частота незапланированной беременности остается значительной проблемой во многих странах мира, включая Россию. Этот показатель может быть существенно снижен при применении обратимых контрацептивных методов длительного действия, к которым относятся внутриматочные контрацептивы: выделяющая левоноргестрел внутриматочная терапевтическая гормональная система и медьсодержащие внутриматочные средства. Внутриматочные контрацептивные средства высокоэффективны, характеризуются малым числом противопоказаний и побочных эффектов, экономически рентабельны при длительном применении и могут быть хорошим выбором для большинства женщин. В статье представлены результаты проспективной многоцентровой неинтервенционной сравнительной наблюдательной программы, главной целью которой явилось изучение переносимости внутриматочных контрацептивов и степени удовлетворенности пациентов результатами их применения.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>contraception</kwd><kwd>reversible contraceptive methods for a long-acting</kwd><kwd>intrauterine therapeutic hormonal system Mirena</kwd><kwd>copper-bearing intrauterine devices</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>контрацепция</kwd><kwd>обратимые контрацептивные методы длительного действия</kwd><kwd>внутриматочная терапевтическая гормональная система Мирена</kwd><kwd>медьсодержащие внутриматочные средства</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Mosher W, Jones J, Abma J. Nonuse of contraception among women at risk of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception 2015; 92 (2): 170-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2009. http://www.un.org/ esa/population/publications/WCU2009/Main.html.Accessed July 20, 2010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Smith J.D, Oakley D. Why do women miss oral contraceptive pills? An analysis of women's self - described reasons for missed pills. J Midwifery Womens Health 2005; 50: 380-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Grimes D.A. Forgettable contraception. Contraception 2009; 80: 497-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Peipert J.F, Zhao Q, Allsworth J.E et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1105-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Moreau C, Trussell J, Desfreres J, Bajos N. Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing anabortion in France. Contraception 2010; 82: 337-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (6): 1434-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Blumenthal P.D, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long - acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 17 (1): 121-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Berenson A.B, Tan A, Jacqueline M et al. Complications and continuation rates associated with 2 types of long - acting contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (6): 761-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Mosher W.D, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2010; 23 (29): 1-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Eeckhaut M.C.W, Sweeney M.M, Gipson J.D. Who Is Using Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods? Findings from Nine Low-Fertility Countries. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014; 46 (3): 149-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Прилепская В.Н., Тагиева А.В., Межевитинова Е.А. Внутриматочная контрацепция. Под. ред. В.Н.Прилепской. М., 2014; с. 40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Allen R.H, Goldberg A.B, Grimes D.A. Expanding access to intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (5): 456-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Leeman L. Medical barriers to effective contraception. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007; 34 (1): 19-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Dehlendorf C, Tharayil M, Anderson N et al. Counseling About IUDs: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014; 46 (3): 133-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Fleming K, Sokoloff A, Raine T.R. Attitudes and beliefs about the IUD among teenagers and young women. Contraception 2010; 82: 178-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Institute of Medicine. Report Brief. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies; Jun. 2009 Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. www.iom.edu/cerpriorities</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Steinauer J.E, Upadhyay U.D, Sokoloff A et al. Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion. Contraception 2015. pii: S0010-7824(15)00251-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Winner B, Peipert J.F, Zhao Q et al. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1998-2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 184-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Trussell J, Lalla A.M, Doan Q.V et al. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009; 79: 5-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Kaneshiro B, Aeby T. Long - term safety, efficacy, and patient accept ability of the intrauterine copper T-380A contraceptive device. Int J Womens Health 2010; 2: 211-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>O’Neil-Callahan M, Peipert J.F, Zhao Q et al. Twenty - four - month continuation of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1083-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Grunloh D.S, Casner T, Secura G.M et al. Characteristics associated with discontinuation of long - acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of use. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1214-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Diedrich J.T, Desai S, Zhao Q et al. Association of short - term bleeding and cramping patterns with long - acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 50.e1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Bahamondes M.V, Monteiro I, Canteiro R et al. Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 113 (1): 50-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Madden T, Mc Nicholas C, Zhao Q et al. Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (4): 718-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Secura G.M, Allsworth J.E, Madden T et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers tolong - acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (2): 11522-115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Xu H, Wade J.A, Peipert J.F et al. Contraceptive failure rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants in overweight and obese women. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 21-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Макаров И.О., Боровкова Е.И. Контрацепция у пациенток с ожирением. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 7 (1): 36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Gemzell-Danielsson K, Pirjo I, Heikinheimo O. Safety and efficacy of the levonorgestrel - releasing intrauterine system: recent in sights. Exp Rev Obstet Gynecol 2013; 8 (3): 235-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Vilos G.A, Marks J, Tureanu V et al. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system is an effective treatment in selected obese women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18 (1): 75-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Robinson J.A, Burke A.E. Obesity and hormonal contraceptive efficacy. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2013; 9 (5): 453-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Wildemeersch D. Potential health benefits of continuous LNG-IUS combined with parenteral ERT for seamless menopausal transition and beyond - a commentary based on clinical experience. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29 (6): 569-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Шестакова И.Г, Хамошина М.Б., Лебедева М.Г., Осьмакова А.А. Терапевтические возможности левоноргестрел - выделяющей внутриматочной системы у женщин в перименопаузе. Фарматека. 2015; 3: 66-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Cleland K, Peipert J.F, Westhoff C et al. Family planning as a cost - saving preventive health service. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (18): e37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Mavranezouli I. The cost - effectiveness of long - acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision - analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1338-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Trussell J, Wynn L.L. Reducing unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception 2008; 77: 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Cleland J. Contraception in historical and global perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23 (2): 165-76.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
