<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гинекология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2079-5696</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2079-5831</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">33265</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Klinicheskie aspekty selektivnogo perenosa odnogo embriona v programmakh vspomogatel'nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologiy s pozitsii akusherstva i perinatologii (obzor literatury)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Клинические аспекты селективного переноса одного эмбриона в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий с позиции акушерства и перинатологии (обзор литературы)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Krasnoshchoka</surname><given-names>O E</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Краснощока</surname><given-names>О Е</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава РФ, Москва</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Smol'nikova</surname><given-names>V Yu</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Смольникова</surname><given-names>В Ю</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава РФ, Москва</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kalinina</surname><given-names>E A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Калинина</surname><given-names>Е А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава РФ, Москва</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. акад. В.И.Кулакова Минздрава РФ, Москва</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-06-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO3 (2012)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 14, №3 (2012)</issue-title><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-04-13"><day>13</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2012, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2012, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/33265">https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/33265</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p/></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p/></trans-abstract></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1. Краснопольский В.И. и др. Современные проблемы многоплодной беременности (доклад на 4-м Всероссийском съезде акушеров-гинекологов. 30.09.2008). Вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2009; 2: 79-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2. Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Thomas C et al. One versus two embryo transfers after IVF and ICSI: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 551-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3. Тишкевич О.Л., Жабинская А.Б., Алексеева Е.В., Волоханович С.М. Эффективность ЭКО и частота многоплодной беременности в зависимости от числа и качества переносимых эмбрионов у женщин разного возраста. Проблемы репродукции 2008; 2 (2): 8-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4. Neubourg DD, Gerris JM, Mangelschots K et al. The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF. ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1041-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5. Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E et al. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in-vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 102 (2): 203-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2392-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7. Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 210-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8. Veleva Z, Karinen P, Toma C et al. Elective single embryo transfer cryopreservation improves outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (7): 1632-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 261.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10. Allen C, Bowdin S, Harrison RF et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 177 (3): 233-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11. Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (4): 1073-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1301-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13. Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruissinck G et al. Perinatal outcome of pregnansies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 688-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14. Gerris JM. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11: 105-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15. Chen XK, Wen SW, Bottomley J et al. In vitro fertilization is associated with increased risk of preeclampsia. Hypert Preg 2009; 28 (1): 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>16. Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (4): 1073-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>17. Gleicher N, Barad D. Twin pregnancy, contrary to consensus, is a desirable outcome in infertility. Fertility and Sterility 2009; 91 (6): 2426-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>18. Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11 (6): 575-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>19. Pandian Z, Templeton A, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (10): 2681-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>20. Kallen B. Maternal morbidity and mortality in in vitro fertilization. Best Pract Clin Obst Gynaecol 2008; 22 (3): 549-58.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
