<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гинекология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2079-5696</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2079-5831</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">679550</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26442/20795696.2025.2.203281</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНАЯ СТАТЬЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Hybrid pelvic floor reconstruction using a vaginal flap with unilateral apical fixation in the management of post-hysterectomy prolapse: A retrospective study</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гибридная реконструкция тазового дна с применением влагалищного лоскута с унилатеральной апикальной фиксацией в коррекции постгистерэктомического пролапса</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-3451</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">560256</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shkarupa</surname><given-names>Dmitry D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шкарупа</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Дмитриевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Med.), Saint Petersburg State University</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, дир. Клиники высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова ФГБОУ ВО СПбГУ</p></bio><email>rustam.shahaliev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2450-7044</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4013-7450</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shakhaliev</surname><given-names>Rustam A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шахалиев</surname><given-names>Рустам Алигисметович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>gynecologist</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-гинеколог Клиники высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова</p></bio><email>rustam.shahaliev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5189-4639</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">821347</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1155-5070</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kubin</surname><given-names>Nikita D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кубин</surname><given-names>Никита Дмитриевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, врач-уролог Клиники высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова</p></bio><email>rustam.shahaliev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8655-7234</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shulgin</surname><given-names>Andrei S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шульгин</surname><given-names>Андрей Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, зам. дир. по лечебной работе – глав. врач Клиники высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова</p></bio><email>rustam.shahaliev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8898-8851</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Muldarov</surname><given-names>Zaynulabid I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мульдаров</surname><given-names>Зайнулабид Исламович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>urologist, Saint Petersburg State University</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-уролог Клиники высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова</p></bio><email>rustam.shahaliev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-1435</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sultonov</surname><given-names>Firdavskhuja P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Султонов</surname><given-names>Фирдавсхуджа Пулотхуджаевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>urologist, Saint Petersburg State University</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-уролог Клиники высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова</p></bio><email>rustam.shahaliev@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saint Petersburg State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО «Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-06-17" publication-format="electronic"><day>17</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>148</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-05-12"><day>12</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/679550">https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/679550</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Aim</bold><bold>. </bold>To evaluate the anatomical effectiveness and safety of hybrid pelvic floor reconstruction using a vaginal flap with unilateral apical fixation in women with post-hysterectomy prolapse.</p> <p><bold>Materials</bold><bold> </bold><bold>and</bold><bold> </bold><bold>methods</bold><bold>. </bold>This retrospective study included 62 female patients with stage II–IV vaginal vault prolapse (according to the POP-Q classification) who underwent a novel surgical technique. The primary endpoint was anatomical success; secondary endpoints included changes in quality of life (PFDI-20, ICIQ-SF questionnaires) and patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes.</p> <p><bold>Results</bold><bold>. </bold>The mean follow-up period was 14.86 months. Anatomical success was achieved in 93.5% of cases. No cases of implant erosion or chronic pelvic pain were reported. Significant improvement in pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms was observed across all PFDI-20 subscales (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). Vaginal length significantly increased postoperatively. Recurrence of prolapse occurred in 6.5% of cases and required reoperation. Two cases of intraoperative bladder injury were noted, which did not affect the final outcomes.</p> <p><bold>Conclusion</bold><bold>. </bold>Hybrid pelvic floor reconstruction using a vaginal flap with unilateral apical fixation demonstrated high anatomical efficacy and safety in the correction of post-hysterectomy prolapse. However, further prospective studies with control groups and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Цель. </bold>Оценить анатомическую эффективность и безопасность гибридной реконструкции тазового дна с использованием влагалищного лоскута и унилатеральной апикальной фиксации у женщин с постгистерэктомическим пролапсом.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы. </bold>В ретроспективное исследование включены 62 пациентки с пролапсом купола культи влагалища II–IV степени (по классификации POP-Q – Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantifications System), которым сделана хирургическая коррекция по оригинальной методике. Первичной конечной точкой считали анатомическую эффективность, вторичными – изменение качества жизни (опросники PFDI-20, ICIQ-SF) и удовлетворенность результатами лечения.</p> <p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Средняя продолжительность наблюдения – 14,86 мес. Анатомическая эффективность метода составила 93,5%, случаев эрозии импланта и хронической тазовой боли не зафиксировано. Значимое улучшение симптомов дисфункции тазового дна достигнуто по всем субшкалам опросника PFDI-20 (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0,001). Длина влагалища статистически значимо увеличилась. В 6,5% случаев зарегистрирован рецидив пролапса, потребовавший повторной коррекции. В ходе операции отмечено 2 случая повреждения мочевого пузыря, не повлиявшие на конечный результат.</p> <p><bold>Заключение. </bold>Гибридная реконструкция тазового дна с применением влагалищного лоскута с унилатеральной апикальной фиксацией продемонстрировала высокую анатомическую эффективность и безопасность в коррекции постгистерэктомического пролапса. Тем не менее необходимы дальнейшие проспективные исследования с включением контрольных групп и более длительным периодом наблюдения.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>pelvic organ prolapse</kwd><kwd>vaginal flap</kwd><kwd>post-hysterectomy prolapse</kwd><kwd>correction of post-hysterectomy prolapse</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>пролапс тазовых органов</kwd><kwd>влагалищный лоскут</kwd><kwd>постгистерэктомический пролапс</kwd><kwd>коррекция постгистерэктомического пролапса</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The authors declare that there is no external funding for the exploration and analysis work</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Авторы декларируют отсутствие внешнего финансирования для проведения исследования и публикации статьи</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Robinson D, Thiagamoorthy G, Cardozo L. Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Maturitas. 2018;107:39-43. DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Краснопольский В.И., Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А., Попов А.А. Оперативная гинекология. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2010 [Krasnopolskii VI, Buianova SN, Shchukina NA, Popov AA. Operativnaia ginekologiia. Moscow: MEDpress-inform, 2010 (in Russian)].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt. 1):233-41. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):897-909. DOI:10.1097/00003081-199312000-00015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, et al. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1623-9. DOI:10.1007/s00192-008-0718-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association. Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):429-63. DOI:10.1007/s00192-020-04236-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Coolen AWM, Bui BN, Dietz V, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1767-83. DOI:10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang W, Cheon WC, Zhang L, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(1):3-13. DOI:10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Noé GK. Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues? J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):267. DOI:10.3390/jcm10020267</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Abhari RE, Izett-Kay ML, Morris HL, et al. Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18(12):725-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Takacs EB, Kreder KJ. Sacrocolpopexy: surgical technique, out-comes, and complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17(12):90. DOI:10.1007/s11934-016-0643-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016-24. DOI:10.1001/jama.2013.4919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):205-12. DOI:10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Сучков Д.А., Шахалиев Р.А., Шульгин А.С., и др. Унилатеральная гибридная хирургическая реконструкция тазового дна. Модифицированная лоскутная методика. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2024;23(1):16-23 [Suchkov DA, Shakhaliev RA, Shulgin AS, et al. Unilateral hybrid pelvic floor surgical reconstruction. Modified flap technique. Voprosy Ginekologii, Akusherstva i Perinatologii. 2024;23(1):16-23 (in Russian)]. DOI:10.20953/1726-1678-2024-1-16-23</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Cosson M, Collinet P, Occelli B, et al. The vaginal patch plastron for vaginal cure of cystocele. Preliminary results for 47 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;95(1):73-80. DOI:10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00341-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Morgan MM, Rogers DA, Huebner M, et al. Heterogenieity in anatomic outcome of a sacrospinous fixation for prolapse. A systematic review. Obstet Gyanecol. 2007;109:1424-33. DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000264066.89094.21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Nygaard IE, McCreery, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;104:805-23. DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Maher C, Yeung E, Haya N, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7(7):CD012376. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Qu DC, Chen HB, Yang MM, Zhou HG. Management of lumbar spondylodiscitis developing after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with a mesh: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(49):e18252. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000018252</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Tinelli A, Yassa M, Marzo G, et al. Spondylodiscitis after sacral colpopexy: diagnose early to treat earlier. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024;17(3):90-5. DOI:10.62347/RERC7901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Jones KA, Zhuo Y, Solak S, Harmanli O. Hysterectomy at the time of colpocleisis: a decision analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):805-10. DOI:10.1007/s00192-015-2903-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Laumann EO, Paik A, Glasser DB, et al. A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: findings from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(2):145-61. DOI:10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Gencdal S, Demirel E, Soyman Z, Kelekci S. Prophylactic McCall Culdoplasty by a Vaginal Approach during Mini-Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:8047924. DOI:10.1155/2019/8047924</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Chene G, Tardieu AS, Savary D, et al. Anatomical and functional results of McCall culdoplasty in the prevention of enteroceles and vaginal vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1007-11. DOI:10.1007/s00192-007-0549-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Romanova A, Sifri Y, Gaigbe-Togbe B, et al. Trends in Apical Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Impact of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Recommendations. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(3):e66-72. DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001143</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
