SENSITIVITY OF QUARANTINE PHYTOPATHOGENS (CERCOSPORA KIKUCHII, COCHLIOBOLUS CARBONUM, DIAPORTHE HELIANTHI) TO A NUMBER OF ACTIVE FUNGICIDES INGREDIENTS
- Authors: Kostin N.K1,2, Kuznetsova A.A1,2, Surina T.A1,2, Beloshapkina O.O2
-
Affiliations:
- All-Russian Center for Plant Quarantine
- K.A. Tintyazev Russian State Agrarian Universiti – MTAA
- Issue: No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 57-68
- Section: Crop Production and Selection
- URL: https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2500-2082/article/view/697475
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034519725060126
- ID: 697475
Cite item
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the biological effectiveness (BE) of nine active ingredients of fungicides from different classes (benzimidazoles, triazoles, antildes, strobilarins) against three species of phytopathogenic fungi quarantined for the EAEU: Cercospora Kikuchi, Diaporthe helianthi, Cochliobolus carbonum, and their closely related species (Cercospora sigma, Diaporthe novem, Helminthosporium maydis). The studies were conducted in 2025 in the mycology laboratory of the All-Russian Plant Quarantine Center (FSBI All-Russia Plant Quarantine Center). In vitro tests were conducted on potato dextrose agar, and the effects of the substances were assessed at four concentrations (10, 50, 100, and 200 mg/L). Data were collected on day 14. Biological effectiveness (BE, %) was calculated relative to the control. It was established that susceptibility was species-specific: C. Kikuchi was effectively inhibited mainly by triazoles (prothioconazole >100 mg/L), while strobilarins, antildes, and benzimidazoles were weakly effective; C. sigma retained high susceptibility to almost all classes. For C. carbonum and H. maydis, triazoles provided primary inhibition (up to 100%), strobilarins and antildes showed a partial dose-dependent effect, and benzimidazoles were less effective. D. helianthi was completely inhibited by triazoles and high doses of benzimidazoles, and D. novem responded only to triazoles and benzimidazoles, not to strobilarins and antildes. The obtained data confirm the need for species-specific specification in registration and methodological materials and indicate the feasibility of using protection schemes based on triazoles and rotation of mechanisms of action.
About the authors
N. K Kostin
All-Russian Center for Plant Quarantine; K.A. Tintyazev Russian State Agrarian Universiti – MTAA
Email: kostinwork1@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-8066-0753
PhD Student, Junior Researcher Bykovo, Ramensky District, Moscow Region, Russia
A. A Kuznetsova
All-Russian Center for Plant Quarantine; K.A. Tintyazev Russian State Agrarian Universiti – MTAA
Email: kostinwork1@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8443-2641
Senior Researcher
Moscow, RussiaT. A Surina
All-Russian Center for Plant Quarantine; K.A. Tintyazev Russian State Agrarian Universiti – MTAA
Email: kostinwork1@gmail.com
PhD in Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher
Bykovo, RussiaO. O Beloshapkina
K.A. Tintyazev Russian State Agrarian Universiti – MTAA
Author for correspondence.
Email: kostinwork1@gmail.com
Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences, Professor
Moscowб RussiaReferences
- Dudchenko I.P. i dr. Gribnye zabolevaniya soi na Dal'nem Vostoke //Fitosanitariya. Karantin rastenij. 2023. № 4. S. 2–16.
- Evrazijskaya ekonomicheskaya komissiya. Edinye karantinnye fitosanitarnye trebovaniya. M.: EEK, 2024.
- Kuznecova A.A., Surina T.A., Kostin N.K. Opredelenie biologicheskoj effektivnosti fungicidov protiv karantinnyh vozbuditelej boleznej zernovyh, bobovyh i maslichnyh kul'tur v laboratornyh usloviyah // Fitosanitariya. Karantin rastenij. 2025. № 1(22). S. 15–25. EDN: ZALFOG. https://doi.org/10.69536/FKR.2025.42.94.002
- Ministerstvo sel'skogo hozyajstva RF. Gosudarstvennyj katalog pesticidov i agrohimikatov, razreshennyh k primeneniyu na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii (elektronnyj resurs). M.: Minsel'hoz Rossii, 2024. URL: https://mcx.gov.ru/ministry/departments/departament-rastenievodstva-mekhanizatsiikhimizatsii-i-zashchity-rasteniy/industry-information/info-gosudarstvennyy-katalog-pestitsidov-i-agrokhimikatov/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.08.2025).
- Nacional'nyj doklad o karantinnom fitosanitarnom sostoyanii territorii Rossijskoj Federacii v 2024 g // Fitosanitariya. Karantin rastenij. 2025. № 2(23). S. 2–16. EDN OXZRWV.
- Reshenie Soveta EEK № 158 ot 30.11.2016 (v red. ot 29.11.2024) «O edinom perechne karantinnyh ob"ektov». M.: EEK, 2024.
- Rossel'hoznadzor. Nacional'nyj doklad o karantinnom fitosanitarnom sostoyanii territorii Rossijskoj Federacii v 2023 godu. M.: Rossel'hoznadzor, 2024. 96 s.
- Rosstat. Itogovye dannye uborki urozhaya v RF v 2024 godu // GlavAgronom. 2025. URL: https://glavagronom.ru/news/rosstat-opublikoval-itogovye-dannye-uborki-urozhaya-v-rf-v-2024-godu (data obrashcheniya: 22.08.2025).
- Baidyaroy D. et al. Characterization of inhibitor-resistant histone deacetylase activity in plant-pathogenic fungi // Eukaryotic Cell. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 4. P. 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.1.4.538-547.2002.
- Chen Q. et al. Occurrence of Cochliobolus carbonum in maize fields of China // Plant Protection. 2018.
- Debaeke Ph. et al. Sunflower crop and climate change: vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential from case-studies in Europe // OCL – Oilseeds and fats, Crops and Lipids. 2017. Vol. 24. No. 1. Art. D102. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016043.
- EPPO. Cercospora kikuchii // EPPO Global Database. Paris: EPPO, 2024. URL: https://gd.eppo.int (дата обращения: 22.08.2025).
- FAO. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPMs). Rome: FAO, 2022. 132 p.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Agricultural production statistics 2010–2023: FAOSTAT Analytical Briefs. Rome: FAO, 2024. No. 96. URL: https://www.fao.org/faostat (дата обращения: 20.08.2025).
- FRAC. FRAC Code List 2024: Fungal control agents sorted by cross-resistance pattern and mode of action (including coding for FRAC Groups on product labels). 2024. URL: https://www.frac.info (дата обращения: 01.09.2025).
- IPPC. International Plant Protection Convention. Rome: FAO, 2023. 88 p.
- Latorre Rapela M. G. de los M., Lura M. C.E., Marcipar I.S. Early detection of Cercospora species in soybean plants: Immunologic and molecular methods. 2015.
- Masirevic S., Gulya T.J. Sclerotinia and Phomopsis – two devastating sunflower pathogens // Field Crops Research. 1992. Vol. 30. Issues 3–4. P. 271–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(92)90004-W.
- Mathew F. et al. Phomopsis stem canker of sunflower // Plant Health Instructor. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-I-2018-0510-01.
- Mohan K. et al. G143A Mutation identified in Diaporthe helianthi causing Phomopsis Stem Canker in Sunflower // Plant Health Progress. 2025. (Ahead-of-print / in press).
- Multani D.S. et al. Plant–pathogen microevolution: molecular basis for the origin of a fungal disease in maize // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). 1998. Vol. 95. No. 4. P. 1686–1691. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1686.
- Nelson R.R. Genes for pathogenicity in Cochliobolus carbonum // Phytopathology. 1970. Vol. 60. No. 9. P. 1335–1341.
- OECD; FAO. Agricultural Outlook 2025–2034. Paris; Rome: OECD Publishing / FAO, 2025. 708 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/601276cd-en.
- Price P.P. III, Purvis M.A., Robertson C.L. et al. Fungicide resistance in Cercospora kikuchii, a soybean pathogen // Plant Disease. 2015. Vol. 99. No. 11. P. 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-14-1249-RE.
- Price P.P. III, Purvis M.A., Robertson C.L. et al. Cercospora Leaf Blight Pathogen Resistant to Fungicides // Louisiana Agriculture. Winter 2014. LSU AgCenter.URL: https://www.lsuagcenter.com/…/cercosporaleafblightpathogenresistantto (дата обращения: 01.09.2025).
- Sautua F.J. et al. Cercospora Leaf Blight and Purple Seed Stain in Soybean: Insights and Challenges with a South American Perspective // Plant Health Cases. 2025. Article: phcs20250007.
- Sautua F.J. et al. Cercospora leaf blight and purple seed stain of soybean: A permanent challenge // Plant Pathology. 2024. Vol. 73. No. 8. P. 1981–2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13936.
- Sautua F.J. et al. Cercospora leaf blight and purple seed stain of soybean: A permanent challenge // Plant Pathology. 2024. Vol. 73. No. 8. P. 1981–2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13936.
- Sautua F.J. et al. Fungicide resistance in Cercospora species causing cercospora leaf blight and purple seed stain of soybean in Argentina // Plant Pathology. 2020. Vol. 69. No. 9. P. 1678–1694. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13210.
- Turner R.E., Ebelhar M.W., Wilkerson T. et al. Effects of purple seed stain on seed quality and composition in soybean // Plants. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 8. P. 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9080993.
- Ullstrup A.J. The impacts of the southern corn leaf blight epidemics of 1970–1971 // Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1972. Vol. 10. P. 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.000345.
- United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA FAS). Oilseeds – World Markets and Trade: Monthly Report. Washington: USDA FAS, 2024. URL: https://apps.fas.usda.gov (дата обращения: 20.08.2025).
- White D.G. (ed.). Compendium of Corn Diseases. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: APS Press, 1999. vii + 78 p.
Supplementary files

