Some features of interacting solar wind disturbances

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Using the updated Forbush Effects and Interplanetary Disturbances Database (https://tools.izmiran.ru/feid), an extensive analysis of the various characteristics of events caused by the influence of interacting solar wind disturbances on near-Earth space was carried out. In particular, the cases of different combinations of pair interaction of high-speed streams from coronal holes and coronal mass ejections over a long period from 1995 to 2022 are considered. Variations in the flux of galactic cosmic rays (with a rigidity of 10 GV), changes in the parameters of the interplanetary medium and geomagnetic activity are described. It is shown that the degree of mutual influence depends on the time between the registration of neighboring events, while the most pronounced changes in various parameters exist for events in which interaction occurred before reaching the Earth’s orbit. It has also been established that in interacting solar wind disturbances, not only the extrema of the parameters of cosmic rays, interplanetary medium and geomagnetic activity are subject to changes, but also their time profile.

Авторлар туралы

N. Shlyk

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

A. Belov

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

M. Abunina

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

S. Belov

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

A. Abunin

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

V. Oleneva

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

V. Yanke

Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nshlyk@izmiran.ru
Ресей, Moscow, Troitsk

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Белов А.В., Ерошенко Е.А., Янке Г.В., Оленева В.А., Абунина М.А., Абунин А.А. Метод глобальной съемки для мировой сети нейтронных мониторов // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. Т. 58. № 3. С. 374–389. 2018. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0016794018030082
  2. Шлык Н.С., Белов А.В., Абунина М.А., Ерошенко Е.А., Абунин А.А., Оленева В.А., Янке В.Г. Влияние взаимодействующих возмущений солнечного ветра на вариации галактических космических лучей // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. Т. 61. № 6. С. 694–703. 2021. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016794021060134
  3. Behannon K.W., Burlaga L.F., Hewish A. Structure and evolution of compound streams at ≤1 AU // J. Geophys. Res. V. 96. P. 21213–21225. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02267
  4. Belov A.V., Eroshenko E.A., Oleneva V.A., Struminsky A.B., Yanke V.G. What determines the magnitude of Forbush decreases? // Adv. Space Res. V. 27. № 3. P. 625–630. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(01)00095-3
  5. Burlaga L.F., Behannon K.W., Klein L.W. Compound streams, magnetic clouds, and major geomagnetic storms // J. Geophys. Res. V. 92. № A6. P. 5725–5734. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA06p05725
  6. Burlaga L.F., Plunkett S.P., St. Cyr O.C. Successive CMEs and complex ejecta // J. Geophys. Res. V. 107. № A10. ID 1266. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000255
  7. Burlaga L., Berdichevsky D., Gopalswamy N., Lepping R., Zurbuchen T. Merged interaction regions at 1 AU // J. Geophys. Res. V. 108. № A12. ID 1425. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010088
  8. Chen C., Wang Y., Shen C., Ye P., Zhang J., Wang S. Statistical study of coronal mass ejection source locations: 2. Role of active regions in CME production // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 116. № A12. ID A12108. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016844
  9. Dasso S., Mandrini C.H., Schmieder B., et al. Linking two consecutive nonmerging magnetic clouds with their solar sources: tracking two consecutive magnetic clouds // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 114. № A2. ID A02109. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013102
  10. Farrugia C.J., Berdichevsky D.B. Evolutionary signatures in complex ejecta and their driven shocks // Ann. Geophysicae. V. 22. № 10. P. 3679–3698. 2004. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-3679-2004
  11. Gopalswamy N., Yashiro S., Kaiser M.L., Howard R.A., Bougeret J.L. Radio Signatures of Coronal Mass Ejection Interaction: Coronal Mass Ejection Cannibalism? // Astrophys. J. V. 548. P. L91–L94. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1086/318939
  12. Gopalswamy N., Yashiro S., Michałek G., Kaiser M.L., Howard R.A., Reames D.V., Leske R., von Rosenvinge T. Interacting Coronal Mass Ejections and Solar Energetic Particles // Astrophys. J. V. 572. № 1. P. L103–L107. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1086/341601
  13. Gopalswamy N., Mäkelä P., Xie H., Akiyama S., Yashiro S. CME interactions with coronal holes and their interplanetary consequences // J. Geophys. Res. V. 114. P. A00–A22. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013686
  14. Hajra R., Sunny J.V., Babu M., Nair A.G. Interplanetary sheaths and corotating interaction regions: A comparative statistical study on their characteristics and geoeffectiveness // Solar Phys. V. 297. ID 97. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02020-6
  15. Heinemann S.G., Temmer M., Farrugia C.J. et al. CME–HSS Interaction and Characteristics Tracked from Sun to Earth // Solar Phys. V. 294. ID 121. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1515-6
  16. Ivanov K.G. A study of some interplanetary shock wave tendencies // Space Sci. Rev. V. 32. P. 49–63. 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225176
  17. Kahler S.W., Vourlidas A. Fast coronal mass ejection environments and the production of solar energetic particle events // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 110. № A12. ID A12S01. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011073
  18. Liu M., Liu Y.D., Yang Z., Wilson III L.B., Hu H. Kinetic properties of an interplanetary shock propagating inside a coronal mass ejection // Astrophys. J. V. 859. № 1. ID L4. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aac269
  19. Liu Y., Shen F., Yang Y. Numerical Simulation on the propagation and deflection of fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Interacting with a corotating interaction region in interplanetary space // Astrophys. J. V. 887. № 2. ID 150. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab543e
  20. Lugaz N., Manchester IV W.B., Gombosi T.I. Numerical simulation of the interaction of two coronal mass ejections from Sun to Earth // Astrophys. J. V. 634. № 1. P. 651–662. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1086/491782
  21. Lugaz N., Farrugia C.J., Davies J.A., Möstl C., Davis C.J., Roussev I.I., Temmer M. The deflection of the two interacting coronal mass ejections of 2010 May 23–24 as revealed by combined in situ measurements and heliospheric imaging // Astrophys. J. V. 759. № 1. ID 68. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/68
  22. Lugaz N., Farrugia C.J., Manchester IV W.B., Schwadron N. The interaction of two coronal mass ejections: influence of relative orientation // Astrophys. J. V. 778. № 1. ID 20. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/20
  23. Lugaz N., Farrugia C.J., Huang C.-L., Spence H.E. Extreme geomagnetic disturbances due to shocks within CMEs: geomagnetic effects of shocks inside CME // Geophys. Res. Lett. V. 42. № 12. P. 4694–4701. 2015a. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064530
  24. Lugaz N., Farrugia C.J., Smith C.W., Paulson K. Shocks inside CMEs: a survey of properties from 1997 to 2006 // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 120. № 4. P. 2409–2427. 2015b. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020848
  25. Lugaz N., Temmer M., Wang Y., Farrugia C.J. The Interaction of Successive Coronal Mass Ejections: A Review // Solar Phys. V. 292. ID 64. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1091-6
  26. Mäkelä P., Gopalswamy N., Xie H., Mohamed A.A., Akiyama S., Yashiro S. Coronal hole influence on the observed structure of interplanetary CMEs // Solar Phys. V. 284. P. 59–75. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0211-6
  27. Matzka J., Stolle C., Yamazaki Y., Bronkalla O., Morschhauser A. The geomagnetic Kp index and derived indices of geomagnetic activity // Space Weather. V. 19. № 5. ID e2020SW002641. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002641
  28. Mishra W., Srivastava N., Singh T. Kinematics of interacting CMEs of 25 and 28 September 2012: interacting CMEs // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 120. № 12. P. 10221–10236. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021415
  29. Moon Y.J., Choe G.S., Wang H., Park Y.D. Sympathetic Coronal Mass Ejections // Astrophys. J. V. 588. № 2. P. 1176–1182. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1086/374270
  30. Odstrčil D., Dryer M., Smith Z. Propagation of an interplanetary shock along the heliospheric plasma sheet // J. Geophys. Res. V. 101. № A9. P.19973–19986. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA00479
  31. Odstrčil D., Riley P., Zhao X.P. Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 109. № A2. ID A02116. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010135
  32. Rodkin D.G., Shugay Y.S., Slemzin I.S., Veselovsky V. A. Interaction of high-speed and transient fluxes of solar wind at the maximum of solar cycle 24 // Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. V. 43. P. 287–290. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068335616090062
  33. Rodkin D., Slemzin V., Zhukov A.N., Goryaev F., Shugay Y., Veselovsky I. Single ICMEs and Complex Transient Structures in the Solar Wind in 2010 – 2011 // Solar Phys. V. 293. ID 78. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1295-4
  34. Schmidt J.M., Cargill P.J. A numerical study of two interacting coronal mass ejections // Ann. Geophys. V. 22. № 6. P. 2245–2254. 2004. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-2245-2004
  35. Shen F., Feng X.S., Wang Y., Wu S.T., Song W.B., Guo J.P., Zhou Y.F. Three-dimensional MHD simulation of two coronal mass ejections’ propagation and interaction using a successive magnetized plasma blobs model // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 116. № A9. ID A09103. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016584
  36. Shen F., Wu S.T., Feng X., Wu C.-C. Acceleration and deceleration of coronal mass ejections during propagation and interaction: acceleration and deceleration of CME // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 117. № A11. ID A11101. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017776
  37. Shen F., Wang Y., Shen C., Feng X. On the collision nature of two coronal mass ejections: A Review // Solar Phys. V. 292. ID 104. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1129-9
  38. Shlyk N.S, Belov A.V., Abunina M.A., Abunin A.A., Oleneva V.A., Yanke V.G. Forbush decreases caused by paired interacting solar wind disturbances // Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. V. 511. № 4. P. 5897–5908. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac478
  39. Temmer M., Veronig A.M., Peinhart V., Vršnak B. Asymmetry in the CME-CME interaction process for the events from 2011 February 14-15 // Astrophys. J. V. 785. № 2. ID 85. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/85
  40. Wang Y., Wang S., Ye P. Multiple magnetic clouds in interplanetary space // Solar Phys. V. 211. P. 333–344. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022404425398
  41. Wang Y.M., Ye P.Z., Wang S. Multiple magnetic clouds: several examples during March–April 2001 // J. Geophys. Res. V. 108. № A10. ID 1370. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009850
  42. Wang Y., Liu L., Shen C., Liu R., Ye P., Wang S. Waiting times of quasi-homologous Coronal Mass Ejections from super active regions // Astrophys. J. Lett. V. 763. № 2. ID L43. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/763/2/L43
  43. Wang Y., Shen C., Liu R., Liu J., Guo J., Li X., Xu M., Hu Q., Zhang T. Understanding the twist distribution inside magnetic flux ropes by anatomizing an interplanetary magnetic cloud: twist distribution in an interplanetary MC // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 123. № 5. P. 3238–3261. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024971
  44. Xiong M., Zheng H., Wang S. Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the interaction between two interplanetary magnetic clouds and its consequent geoeffectiveness: 2. Oblique collision // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 114. № A11. ID A11101. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014079
  45. Xiong M., Zheng H., Wang Y., Wang S. Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the interaction between interplanetary strong shock and magnetic cloud and its consequent geoeffectiveness: 2. Oblique collision // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 111. № A11. ID A11102. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011901
  46. Xu M., Shen C., Wang Y., Luo B., Chi Y. Importance of shock compression in enhancing ICME’s geoeffectiveness // Astrophys. J. V. 884. № 2. ID L30. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab4717
  47. Yermolaev Y.I., Lodkina I.G., Khokhlachev A.A., Yermolaev M.Y. Peculiarities of the heliospheric state and the solar-wind/magnetosphere coupling in the era of weakened solar activity // Universe. V. 8. № 10. ID 495. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8100495
  48. Zhang J., Wang J. Are Homologous Flare-Coronal Mass Ejection Events Triggered by Moving Magnetic Features? // Astrophys. J. V. 566. № 2. ID L117. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1086/339660
  49. Zhang J., Richardson I.G., Webb D.F. et al. Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms (Dst ≤ −100 nT) during 1996–2005 // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 112. № A10. ID A10102. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012321
  50. Zhang J., Richardson I.G., Webb D.F. Interplanetary origin of multiple-dip geomagnetic storms // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 113. № A3. ID A00A12. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013228
  51. Zhang J., Temmer M., Gopalswamy N. et al. Earth-affecting solar transients: a review of progresses in solar cycle 24 // Prog. Earth Planet Sci. V. 8. ID 56. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00426-7
  52. Zhou Y., Feng X. Numerical study of the propagation characteristics of coronal mass ejections in a structured ambient solar wind // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 122. № 2. P. 1451–1462. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023053

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024