Approaches to inequality in eu social policy

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article examines existing approaches to inequality in social policy at the present stage of development of the European social model. The study focuses on the differences between vertical and horizontal, or group, inequality, inequality of opportunities and outcomes, compensation policy and social investment, as well as the representation of different groups as objects of policy. Approaches to understanding inequality are considered using the example of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) and the European Social Fund Plus. It is concluded that at the present stage, European social policy pays a lot of attention to group inequality, the problem of inclusion of various vulnerable groups and countering social exclusion. By combating horizontal inequality, the European Union is trying to solve a number of problems, including unemployment, poverty, professional and economic stratification and disappointment in European integration. The focus on horizontal inequality leads to an increasing construction of vulnerable groups within the framework of social policy, and therefore to differences in their representation in the social and research programs of the European Union, and the focus on inclusion in the labor market raises the issue of ignoring groups that are unable to contribute to building of Social Europe.

Авторлар туралы

Denis Kolesov

Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: deniskolesov@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Аткинсон Э.Б. (2018) Неравенство: как с ним быть. Издательский дом "Дело", РАНХиГС, Москва. 536 с.
  2. Бауман 3. (2015) Идет ли богатство немногих на пользу всем прочим? Институт Гайдара, Москва. 162 с
  3. Борко Ю.А., Биссон Л.С. (2019) Европейская интеграция: перезапуск идеи "Социальной Европы". Современная Европа. № 3. С. 5-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620190517
  4. Давыдов Д.А. (2021) От "власти достойных" к "власти" популярных: блески и нищета меритократии в новую технологическую эпоху. Полития. № 4(103). С. 100-114. doi: 10.30570/2078-5089-2021-103-4-100-114
  5. Каргалова М.В. (1999) От социальной идеи к социальной интеграции. Интердиалект+, Москва. 317 с.
  6. Каргалова М.В., Егорова Е.Н. (2010) Социальное измерение европейской интеграции. Аксиом, Москва. 288 с.
  7. Лункин Р.Н. (2022) Стратификация общества и новые кливажи. Европа в кризисном мире. Под ред. Ал.А. Громыко. Весь мир, Институт Европы РАН, Москва. С. 217-249.
  8. Мартьянов В.С. (2016) Прощай, средний класс. Свободная мысль. № 5. С. 53-70.
  9. Пикетти Т. (2023) Краткая история равенства. АСТ, Москва. 384 с.
  10. Стэндинг Г. (2014) Прекариат: новый опасный класс. Ад Маргинем Пресс, Москва. 328 с.
  11. Cook L.J., Titterton M. (2023) Mapping Shifts in Russian and European Welfare Polities: Explaining Policy Responses to Shared New Social Risks. Social Policy & Society. No. 22(2). P. 321-337.
  12. Crenshaw K. (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum. Issue. No. 1. P. 139-167.
  13. De Neubourg Ch., Weigand Ch. (2000) Social Policy as Social Risk Management. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Vol. 13. Issue 4. P. 401-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610020017372
  14. Esping-Andersen G. (2010) Prologue: What Does it Mean to Break with Bismarck? A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Ed. by B. Palier. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands. P. 11-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048512454.001
  15. Fakuda-Parr S. (2019) Keeping Out Extreme Inequality from the SDG Agenda - The Politics of Indicators. Global Policy. Vol. 10. Issue S1. P. 61-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12602
  16. Giurge L.M., Whillans A.V., West C. (2020) Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations. Nature Human Behaviour. Vol. 4. P. 993-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0920-z
  17. Kucharczyk M. (2021) Social Exclusion in Older-Age and the European Pillar of Social Rights. Social Exclusion in Later Life. Ed. by K. Walsh, Th. Scharf, S. Van Regenmortel, A. Wanka, Springer, Cham, Switzerland. P. 421-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51406-8_33
  18. Taylor-Gooby P. (2004) New Risks and Social Change. New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Ed. by P. Taylor-Gooby. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019926726X.003.0001
  19. Van Dijk J. (2020) The Digital Divide. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK. 208 p.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023