The spatial hearing disability measured by the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in clinically normal-hearing and in mild or moderate sensorineural hearing loss persons

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The spatial hearing in patients with mild and moderate symmetrical chronic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was studied using the Russian-language version of the Spatial hearing questionnaire (SHQ). 141 patients aged 47 to 82 years were examined. The comparative analysis was performed in the groups of age-related normal hearing, mild SNHL, moderate SNHL. A significant deterioration in spatial perception was shown, revealed by the results of the survey in both groups with SNHL, and the mild and moderate hearing loss groups significantly differed in some indicators. The deterioration of spatial perception revealed by the analysis of the subscales of the questionnaire and the quantitative estimates of spatial and temporal resolution obtained earlier with mild and moderate degrees SNHL were in good agreement. With moderate SNHL, the scores of all four subscales of the questionnaire were significantly reduced. In clinical practice, this questionnaire can be used as a screening method for assessing spatial hearing in patients with SNHL.

Sobre autores

E. Klishova

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of RAS

Email: ig-andreeva@mail.ru
Rússia, St. Petersburg

L. Golovanova

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of RAS

Email: ig-andreeva@mail.ru
Rússia, St. Petersburg

I. Andreeva

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of RAS

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ig-andreeva@mail.ru
Rússia, St. Petersburg

Bibliografia

  1. Altman J. A., Tavartkiladze G. А. Rukovodstvo po audiologii. [Handbook of Audiology]. М.: DMK Press, 2003. 360 p. (in Russian).
  2. Babiyak V. I., Nakatis J. A. Klinicheskaya otorinolaringologiya: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. [Clinical Otolaryngology: A Guide for Physicians]. SPb.: Hippocrates, 2005. 800 p. (in Russian).
  3. Vladimirova T. Y., Martynova A. B., Barbasheva S. S. Validaciya i perspektivy primeneniya russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika prostranstvennogo sluha (SHQ). [Validation and prospects for the use of the Russian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ)]. Aspirantskij vestnik Povolzh'ya. [Postgraduate bulletin of the Volga Region]. 2023. V. 23. № 1. P. 15–20. (in Russian). doi: 10.55531/2072–2354.2023.23.1.15–20
  4. Koroleva I. V. Vvedenie v audiologiyu i slukhoprotezirovanie. [Introduction to Audiology and Hearing Aid Fitting]. SPb.: KARO, 2012. 343 p. (in Russian).
  5. Aggius-Vella E., Gori M., Campus C. et al. Auditory distance perception in front and rear space. Hearing Research. 2022. V. 417. Article 108468. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022
  6. Akeroyd M. A. An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2014. V. 18. Article 2331216514560442. doi: 10.1177/2331216514560442
  7. Akeroyd M. A., Whitmer W. M. Spatial hearing and hearing aids. Hearing Aids, eds G. R. Popelka, B. C. J. Moore, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper. Cham. Springer International Publishing, 2016. 181–215. doi: 10.1007/978–3–319–33036–5_7
  8. Andreeva I. G., Gvozdeva A. P., Sitdikov V. M. et al. Comparative assessment of spatial and temporal resolutions in the localization of an approaching and receding broadband noise source in healthy subjects and patients with first-degree symmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Human Physiology. 2020. V. 46. P. 465–472. doi: 10.1134/S0362119720040039
  9. Assef R. A., Almeida K., Miranda-Gonsalez E.C.D. Sensitivity and specificity of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ5) for screening hearing in adults. In CoDAS. 2022. № 34. Р. e20210106. doi: 10.1590/2317–1782/20212021106
  10. Briley P. M., Summerfield A. Q. Age-related deterioration of the representation of space in human auditory cortex. Neurobiology of aging. 2014. V. 35. P. 633–644. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.033
  11. Çildir B., Tokgöz-Yilmaz S., Sennaroğlu G. Spatial Hearing Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version and Correlations with Hearing Skills. Archives Of Acoustics. 2021. V. 46. P. 249–258. doi: 10.24425/aoa.2021.136579
  12. Coudert A., Gaveau V., Gatel J. et al. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements. Ear & Hearing. 2021. V. 43. P. 192–205. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001090
  13. Courtois G., Grimaldi V., Lissek H., Estoppey P., Georganti E. Perception of Auditory Distance in Normal-Hearing and Moderate-to-Profound Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2019. V. 23. P. 1–18. doi: 10.1177/2331216519887615
  14. Davidson A., Souza P. Relationships Between Auditory Processing and Cognitive Abilities in Adults: A Systematic Review. Journ Speech Lang Hear R. 2024. V. 67. P. 296–345. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22–00716
  15. Delphi M., Abdolahi F. Z., Tyler R. et al. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of spatial hearing questionnaire. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2015. V. 29. P. 231.
  16. Divenyi P. L., Stark P. B., Haupt K. M. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005. V. 118. P. 89–100. doi: 10.1121/1.1953207
  17. Dobreva M. S., O'Neill W.E., Paige G. D. Influence of aging on human sound localization. Journal of neurophysiology. 2011. V. 105. P. 2471–2486. doi: 10.1152/jn.00951.2010
  18. Eddins A. C., Ozmeral E. J., Eddins D. A. How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space. Hearing research. 2018. № 369. P. 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.001
  19. Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005. V. 42. P. 9–24. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.01.0006
  20. Freigang C., Schmiedchen K., Nitsche I., Rübsamen R. Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults. Experimental brain research. 2014. № 232. P. 1157–1172. doi: 10.1007/s00221–014–3825–0
  21. Jung W. W., Yun J. S., Lee J. H. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in cochlear implant users. Audiology and Speech Research. 2023. 19. P. 261–273. doi: 10.21848/asr.230121
  22. Klishova E. A., Gvozdeva A. P., Golovanova L. E., Andreeva I. G. Temporal Characteristics of Azimuthally Moving Sound Source Localization in Patients with Mild and Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss. J Evol Biochem Phys. 2021. V. 57. P. 1499–1510. doi: 10.1134/S0022093021060260
  23. Kolarik A. J., Moore B. C.J., Zahorik P., Cirstea S., Pardhan S. Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2016. V. 78. P. 373–395. doi: 10.3758/s13414–015–1015–1
  24. Kong T. H., Park Y. A., Bong J. P., Park S. Y. Validation of the Korean version of the spatial hearing questionnaire for assessing the severity and symmetry of hearing impairment. Yonsei medical journal. 2017. V. 58. P. 842. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.842
  25. Koroleva I. V., Ogorodnikova E. A. Chapter 30: Modern achievements in cochlear and brainstem auditory implantation. Neural Networks and Neurotechnologies. Eds. Yu. Shelepin, E. Ogorodnikova, N. Solovyev, E. Yakimova. SPb.: Publish by VVM, 2019. P. 231–249.
  26. Maneesriwongul W, Dixon J. K. Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journ Adv Nurs. 2004. V. 48. P. 175–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2648.2004.03185.x
  27. Middlebrooks J. C. Sound localization. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2015. V. 129. P. 99–116. doi: 10.1016/B978–0–444–62630–1.00006–8.
  28. Moulin A., Richard C. Validation of a French-language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Ear Hear. 2016. V. 37. P. 412–423. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000269
  29. Moore B. C.J. Cochlear hearing loss: Physiological, psychological, and technical issues (2nd ed.). Wiley, 2007. 332 p.
  30. Moore D. R., King A. J. Auditory perception: The near and far of sound localization. Current Biology. 1999. V. 9. P. R361–R363. doi: 10.1016/S0960–9822(99)80227–9
  31. Ogorodnikova E. A., Klishova E. A., Andreeva I. G. Experimental Approaches to the Study of Sound Source Localization by Distance in Hearing Pathology. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2024. P. 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11055–024–01617–7
  32. Ou H., Wen B., Perreau A., Kim E., Tyler R. Validation of the Chinese Translation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire and Its Short Form. Am J Audiol. 2016. V. 25. P. 25–33. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15–0056
  33. Perreau A. E., Spejcher B., Ou H., Tyler R. The Spatial Hearing Questionnaire: Data from individuals with normal hearing. Am Journ Audiol. 2014. V. 23. P. 173–181. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-13–0049
  34. Potvin J., Punte A. K., Van de Heyning P. Validation of the Dutch version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. B-ENT. 2011. V. 7. P. 235–244.
  35. Sepehrnejad M., Rahimi F., Rahbar N., Nilforoush M. H., Frajadi Rad F. Standardization (translating and evaluating the validity and reliability) of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale Questionnaire-12 (SSQ12) to the Persian language. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research. 2022. V. 9. P. 84–88. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2022.93116.1223
  36. Spence C., Lee J., Van der Stoep N. Responding to sounds from unseen locations: crossmodal attentional orienting in response to sounds presented from the rear. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2020. V. 51 P. 1137–1150. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13733
  37. Tyler R. S., Perreau A. E., Ji H. Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Ear Hear. 2009. V. 30. P. 466–474. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61efe
  38. Tyler R. S., Pienkowski M., Roncancio E. R. et al. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: Part I. Definitions and manifestations. Am J Audiol. 2014. V. 23. P. 402. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-14–0010
  39. Whitmer W. M., Wright-Whyte K.F., Holman J. A., Akeroyd M. A. Hearing Aid Validation. Hearing Aids, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 56. Eds. G. R. Popelka et al. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. P. 291–321.
  40. Xiong Y. Z., Addleman D. A., Nguyen N. A., Nelson P. B., Legge G. E. Visual and auditory spatial localization in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022. V. 14. Article 838194. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.838194
  41. Zhang J., Tyler R., Ji H. et al. Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants. Am J Audiol. 2015. V. 24 (3). P. 84–97. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14–0074.
  42. Zheng Y., Swanson J., Koehnke J., Guan J. Sound Localization of Listeners With Normal Hearing, Impaired Hearing, Hearing Aids, Bone-Anchored Hearing Instruments, and Cochlear Implants: A Review. American Journal of Audiology (AJA). 2022. V. 31. P. 819–834. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22–00006

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024