Recognition of psychoneurological state of children with autism spectrum disorder by features of speech: acoustic and perceptual features

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The work is devoted to studying of recognition of psychoneurological state of children aged 5–14 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), n = 35, and typically developing (TD) children, n = 45, by adults. A perceptual analysis was carried out, in which adult native speakers of the Russian language (auditors), n = 206, took part. Test sequences (audiotests) with words and phrases of ASD and TD children selected from spontaneous speech recordings were created for perceptual research. Auditors’ task was to determine psychoneurological state of children (typical/atypical development) based on auditory perception. A spectrographic analysis of phrases of children was carried out. Phrases of ASD children in comparison with TD children are characterized by lower speech rate, fewer words, great stressed and unstressed vowel duration, great values of pitch in phrase, word, stressed and unstressed vowel.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Nikolaev

St. Petersburg State University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: al.nikolajew@gmail.com
Ресей, St. Petersburg

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Сорокин В.Н., Макаров И.С. Определение пола диктора по голосу // Акуст. журн. 2008. Т. 54. № 4. С. 659–668.
  2. Goy H., Pichora-Fuller M.K., van Lieshout P. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2016. V. 139. № 4. P. 1648.
  3. Bruckert L., Liénard J.S., Lacroix A., Kreutzer M., Leboucher G. Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics // Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2006. V. 273. P. 83–89.
  4. Perrachione T.K., Chiao J.Y., Wong P.C.M. Asymmetriccultural effects on perceptual expertise underlie anown-race bias for voices // Cognition. 2010. V. 114. P. 42–55.
  5. Jones H.N., Crisp K.D., Kuchibhatla M., Mahler L., Risoli Th. Jr., Jones C.W., Kishnani P. Auditory-perceptual speech features in children with Down syndrome // Am. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 2019. V. 124. № 4. P. 324–338.
  6. Kent R.D. Perceptual sensorimotor speech examination for motor speech disorders // Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders. Thieme. 2009. P. 19–29.
  7. O’Leary D., Lee A., O’Toole C., Gibbon F. Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of speech production in Down syndrome: A case series // Clin. Linguist. Phon. 2020. V. 34. № 1–2. P. 72–91.
  8. Verkhodanova V., Trckova D., Coler M., Lowie W. More than words: Cross-linguistic exploration of Parkinson's disease identification from speech // Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2020. V. 12335. P. 613–623.
  9. Ляксо Е.Е., Фролова О.В., Николаев А.С., Григорьев А.С. Перцептивный анализ взрослыми речи детей с расстройствами аутистического спектра, синдром Дауна, умственной отсталостью // Рос. физиол. журн. им. И.М. Сеченова. 2021. Т. 11. № 107. С. 1395–1407.
  10. Frolova O., Gorodnyi V., Nikolaev A., Grigorev A., Grechanyi S., Lyakso E. Developmental disorders manifestation in the characteristics of the child’s Voice and speech: Perceptual and acoustic study // Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2019. V. 11658. P. 103–112.
  11. Redford M.A, Kapatsinski V., Cornell-Fabiano J. Lay Listener Classification and Evaluation of Typical and Atypical Children's Speech // Lang. Speech. 2018. V. 61. № 2. P. 277–302.
  12. Ляксо Е.Е., Фролова О.В., Гречаный С.В., Матвеев Ю.Н., Верхоляк О.В., Карпов А.А. Голосо-вой портрет ребенка с типичным и атипичным развитием. СПб.: Издательско-полиграфическая ассоциация высших учебных заведений, 2020.
  13. Diehl J., Paul R. Acoustic and perceptual measurements of prosody production on the profiling elements of prosodic systems by children with autism spectrum disorders // Appl. Psycholinguist. 2013. V. 34. № 1. P. 135–161.
  14. Bonneh Y.S., Levanov Y., Dean-Pardo O., Lossos L., Adini Y. Abnormal speech spectrum and increased pitch variability in young autistic children // Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011. V. 4. № 237. P. 1–7.
  15. Lyakso E.E., Frolova O.V. Early development indicators predict speech features of autistic children // ICMI '20 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2020 Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interaction. 2020. P. 514–521.
  16. Wolk L., Brennan C. Phonological difficulties in children with autism: an overview // Speech, Lang. Hear. 2016. V. 19. № 2. P. 121–129.
  17. Wing L. The Definition and Prevalence of Autism: A Review // Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 1993. V. 2. № 1. P. 61–74.
  18. Ляксо Е.Е., Фролова О.В., Григорьев А.С., Соколова В.Д., Яроцкая К.А. Распознавание взрослыми эмоционального состояния типично развивающихся детей и детей с расстройствами аутистического спектра // Рос. физиол. журн. им. И.М. Сеченова. 2016. V. 6. № 102. С. 729–741.
  19. Watson L.R., Patten E., Baranek G.T., Poe M., Boyd B.A., Freuler A., Lorenzi J. Differential associations between sensory response patterns and language, social, and communication measures in children with autism or other developmental disabilities // J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2011. V. 54. № 6. P. 1562–76.
  20. Grossman R.B., Edelson L.R., Tager-Flusberg H. Emotional facial and vocal expressions during story retelling by children and adolescents with high-functioning autism // J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2013. V. 56. № 3. P. 1035–1044.
  21. Rapin I., Dunn M.A., Allen D.A., Stevens M.C., Fein D. Subtypes of language disorders in school-age children with autism // Dev. Neuropsychol. 2009. V. 34. № 1. P. 66–84.
  22. Tek S., Mesite L., Fein D., Naigles L. Longitudinal analyses of expressive language development reveal two distinct language profiles among young children with autism spectrum disorders // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2014. V. 44. № 1. P. 75–89.
  23. Boorse J., Cola M., Plate S., Yankowitz L., Pandey J., Schultz R.T., Parish-Morris J. Linguistic markers of autism in girls: evidence of a "blended phenotype" during storytelling // Mol. Autism. 2019. V. 10. P. 14.
  24. Boucher J. Research review: structural language in autistic spectrum disorder – characteristics and causes // J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2012. V. 53. № 3. P. 219–233.
  25. Mazzaggio G., Shield A. The Production of Pronouns and Verb Inflections by Italian Children with ASD: A New Dataset in a Null Subject Language // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2020. V. 50. P. 1425–1433.
  26. Terzi A., Marinis T., Zafeiri A., Francis K. Subject and Object Pronouns in High-Functioning Children with ASD of a Null-Subject Language // Front. Psychol. 2019. V. 10. P. 1301.
  27. Cleland J., Gibbon F.E., Peppé S.J., O'Hare A., Rutherford M. Phonetic and phonological errors in children with high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome // Int. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 2010. V. 1. № 1. P. 69–76.
  28. Kanner L. Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact // Nervous Child. 1943. V. 2. P. 217–250.
  29. Вольф Д.А., Мещеряков Р.В. Модель процесса сингулярного оценивания частоты основного тона речевого сигнала // Акуст. журн. 2016. Т. 62, № 2. С. 216–226.
  30. Filipe M.G., Frota S., Castro S.L., Vicente S.G. Atypical prosody in Asperger syndrome: perceptual and acoustic measurements // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2014. V. 44. № 8. P. 1972–1981.
  31. Lyakso E., Frolova O., Grigorev A. Perception and acoustic features of speech of children with autism spectrum disorders // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2017. V. 10458. P. 602–612.
  32. Sharda M., Subhadra T.P., Sahaya S., Nagaraja Ch., Singh L., Mishra R., Sen A., Singhal N., Erickson D., Singh N. Sounds of melody − Pitch patterns of speech in autism // Neurosci. Lett. 2010. V. 478. № 1. P. 42–45.
  33. Shriberg L.S., Paul Rh., Black L.M., van Santenc J.P. The Hypothesis of apraxia of speech in children with autism spectrum disorder // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2011. V. 41. № 4. P. 405–426.
  34. Paul R., Augustyn A., Klin A., Volkmar F. Perception and production of prosody by speakers with autism spectrum disorders // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2005. V. 35. P. 205–220.
  35. Patel S.P., Nayar K., Martin G.E., Franich K., Crawford S., Diehl J.J., Losh M. An Acoustic Characterization of Prosodic Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder and First-Degree Relatives // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2020. V. 50. № 8. P. 3032–3045.
  36. Lyakso E., Frolova O., Nikolaev A. Voice and speech features as diagnostic symptom // Psychological Applications and Trends. 2021. P. 259–363.
  37. Lyakso E., Frolova O., Kleshnev E., Ruban N., Mekala M., Arulalan K.V. Approbation of the Child's Emotional Development Method (CEDM) // ICMI '22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interaction. 2022. P. 201–210.
  38. Lyakso E., Frolova O., Karpov A. A New Method for Collection and Annotation of Speech Data of Atypically Developing Children // Proc. 2018 Int. Conf. on Sensor Networks and Signal Processing. SNSP 2018. 2019. P. 175–180.
  39. Schopler E., Reichler R.J., DeVellis R.F., Daly K. Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 1980. V. 10. № 1. P. 91–103.
  40. Nicholas J.S., Charles J.M., Carpenter L.A., King L.B., Jenner W., Spratt E.G. Prevalence and characteristics of children with autism spectrum disorders // Ann. Epidemiol. 2008. V. 18. № 2. P. 130–136.
  41. Frauenberger C., Good J., Pares N. Autism and technology: Beyond assistance & intervention // Proc. of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2016. P. 3373–3378.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Average completeness of recognition of the psychoneurological state of children by auditors.

Жүктеу (59KB)
Метадеректер
3. Рис. 2. Скорость речи во фразах детей с РАС и ТР детей; * — p < 0.05; ** — p < 0.01; *** — p < 0.001 — критерий Манна—Уитни.

Жүктеу (56KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Duration of (a) stressed and (b) unstressed vowels from phrases of children with ASD and TD children; * — p <0.05; *** — p <0.001 — Mann-Whitney test.

Жүктеу (145KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Values ​​of the NFT (a) — by phrase and (b) — by word in children with ASD and TD children; ** — p < 0.01 — Mann-Whitney criterion.

Жүктеу (127KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Values ​​of the VOF (a) — stressed and (b) — unstressed vowels from phrases of children with ASD and TD children. * — p < 0.05; ** — p < 0.01 — Mann-Whitney criterion.

Жүктеу (124KB)
Метадеректер

© The Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024