Sanctions legal regime of banking activity
- 作者: Tarasenko O.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
- 期: 编号 11 (2024)
- 页面: 152–162
- 栏目: Budget, taxes, banks
- URL: https://gynecology.orscience.ru/1026-9452/article/view/649057
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224110136
- ID: 649057
如何引用文章
详细
The article presents a critical analysis of the current state of the theory, legislation and practice of the sanctioned legal regime of banking activities. According to the results of the study, it is being analysed and concluded that the term “sanctions” can be used to determine compulsory measures imposed unilaterally by individual states or their unions. The definition of the category “sanctions legal regime of banking activities” is also being presented. The sanctions of foreign states and their unions, depending on their addresses and content, are differentiated into personal (blocking or payment), in relation to the sector of state banks (financial), regional (the Crimea embargo) and country. The classification of sanctions according to the nature of jurisdiction into territorial and extraterritorial is proposed. The differences between the EU and U.S. sanctions policies are being revealed. The negative consequences of the impact of sanctions pressure on the Russian banking system were identified, which include limiting its access to foreign capital markets, blocking international assets, destroying the payment infrastructure, restricting the free circulation of cash currency: euros and dollars. In conclusion, the need to develop the concept of countering the sanctions pressure on the national banking system is justified and its main postulates are formulated.
全文:

作者简介
Olga Tarasenko
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: olga201175@gmail.com
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Entrepreneurial and Corporate Law Chair
俄罗斯联邦, 9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya str., 123995 Moscow.参考
- Actual problems of Russian law: textbook / ed. by I. V. Ershova. M., 2021. P. 212 (in Russ.).
- Bakhin S. V., Eremenko I. Yu. Unilateral economic “sanctions” and International Law // Law. 2017. No. 11. Pp. 162–175 (in Russ.).
- Lauts E. B. Anti-crisis legislation and legislation in the field of state regulation of entrepreneurial activity // Lawyer. 2017. No. 15. P. 10 (in Russ.).
- Pekhtereva E. A. The impact of sanctions on the banking sector of Russia // Economic and social problems of Russia. 2016. No. 2. P. 96 (in Russ.).
- Tarasenko O. A. Entrepreneurial activity of the Bank of Russia // Actual problems of Russ. law. 2020. No. 6. P. 81 (in Russ.).
- Tarasenko O. A. Formation of the doctrine and legislation on legal regimes of banking activity // Herald of the Perm University. Legal sciences. 2021. Iss. 51. P. 105 (in Russ.).
- Terentieva L. V. Extraterritorial manifestation of state jurisdiction in the context of transformation of perception of its state borders // Law. HSE Journal. 2019. No. 3. P. 167 (in Russ.).
- Timofeev I. N. The policy of sanctions of the European Union. Experience in event analysis // Modern Europe. 2021. No. 2. P. 17 (in Russ.).
- Tsechoev V. K., Shvanderova A. R. Theory of state and law: textbook. M., 2017. P. 202 (in Russ.).
- Eckes C. EU restrictive measures against natural and legal persons: from counterterrorist to third country sanctions // Common Market Law Review. 2014. No. 51 (3). Pp. 869–905.
- Jazairy I. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights. 2015. 10 August. Pp. 5–7.
- Johnston C. Sanctions against Russia: Evasion, compensation and overcompliance // European Union Institute for Security Studies. 2015. No. 5. P. 3.
- Welt C., Archick K., Nelson R. M., Rennack D. E. U. S. Sanctions on Russia: Congressional Research Service. 2020. P. 45.
补充文件
