Email this article 
Superpositions of the will of the collective subject
- Authors: Mayboroda V.А.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 60-67
- Section: Civil and entrepreneurial law
- URL: https://gynecology.orscience.ru/1026-9452/article/view/682842
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225020065
- ID: 682842
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article discusses various aspects of the formation of the will of a collective subject. The author proposes the proposition that the collective subject exists in circulation directly in the act of collective will. From the methodological point of view, it is proposed to distinguish between the general opinion assumed by the members of the collective as a phenomenon and the formalized decision of the collective subject (community) achieved by means of legal procedures as a noumenon. The term superposition, borrowed in this case from the branch of mechanics of classical physics, is intended to designate the state of a set of volitional impulses in the phenomenal state represented by the members of the community and in the formalized decision of the community for participation in circulation as a legal fact-noumenon.
Full Text
About the authors
Viktor А. Mayboroda
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: mayboroda-va@ranepa.ru
North-West Institute of Management; Doctor of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Law
Russian Federation, 16–18, 7 Lane V. O., 199034 St. PetersburgReferences
- Aleksandrov N. G. Legality and legal relations in Soviet society. M., 1955. P. 108 (in Russ.).
- Bratus S. N. Subjects of Civil Law. M., 1950. Pp. 8–21 (in Russ.).
- Husserl E. Ideas for pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. M., 1999. Vol. 1. Pp. 223, 280 (in Russ.).
- Egorov A. I. Fundamentals of management theory. M., 2004 (in Russ.).
- Ioffe O. S. Selected works on Civil Law. From the history of civilistic thought. Civil law relations. Criticism of the theory of Economic Law. M., 2020. P. 675 (in Russ.).
- Kant I. Prolegomena to any future metaphysics… 1783 // Kant I. Essays: in 6 vols. M., 1965 (Philosophical heritage). Vol. 4, part I. Pp. 67–209 (in Russ.).
- Kelsen G. Pure doctrine of law / transl. from German by M. V. Antonov, S. V. Lyozov. ed. (1960). SPb., 2015. Pp. 12, 24, 25 (in Russ.).
- Mayboroda V. A. Collective will in the management of agricultural shared ownership land // Legal World. 2019. No. 5. P. 50 (in Russ.).
- Maltsev D. A., Lugovskoy I. K. Silence as a transaction expression of will // Herald of Civil Law. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 81–111 (in Russ.).
- Manigk A. Die Privatautonomie im Aufbau der Rechtsquellen. Berlin, 1935.
- Savigny F. C. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Bd. 2. Berlin, 1840. S. 312, 313.
Supplementary files
