US-EU: Middle East as a Zone of “Shared Responsibility”

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article examines a number of aspects of the process of updating the approaches of the United States and the European Union to the problems of the Middle East (ME), as well as attempts by Washington and Brussels to coordinate their actions under the new conditions. In the United States, the voices of politicians and experts are growing who believe that, despite the fact that threats from the ME are much more significant for the security of Europeans, the latter refrain from increasing their participation in Middle Eastern affairs, still relying on America's military power there. In turn, many European politicians do not hide their disappointment in the US approaches to a number of crises in the Middle East, and increasingly reproach them for the “loss of American leadership” on the world stage. The need for Europeans to increasingly rely on their own strength and resources, formalized in the form of the concept of the EU's “strategic autonomy”, is today determined not only by the situation around Ukraine, but also by the increasing level of conflict in the Middle East – namely, Israel's military actions against Hamas extremists in the Gaza Strip, direct clashes between Israel and Iran, the activation of pro-Iranian groups in Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.

Авторлар туралы

A. Shumilin

Institute of Europe RAS; Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of IE RAS

Email: mideast@bk.ru
Doctor of Sciences (Politics) Chief Researcher; Editor-in-Chief Moscow, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Киссинджер Г. (1997) Дипломатия. Ладомир, Москва. 848 с.
  2. Bianco C., Tasinato E. (2024) Taking Stock of “Aspides”: A Step Forward in Europe’s Geopolitical Role in the Red Sea? Brussels International Center. 27.05. URL: https://www.bic-rhr.com/research/taking-stock-aspides-step-forward-europes-geopolitical-role-red-sea (дата обращения: 15.08.2024).
  3. Fasanotti F.S. (2023) What role for Europe in the Middle East and North Africa? Geopolitical Intelligence Servises. 16.01. URL: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/europe-mena/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2024).
  4. Fasanotti F.S. (2024) The Russian strategy in the Mediterranean. Geopolitical Intelligence Servises. 25.06. URL: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/russia-mediterranean/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2024).
  5. Fayet H. (2022) Quelle posture stratégique pour la France au Moyen-Orient? IFRI, Paris, France. 98 p.
  6. Gildea R. (2019) Empires of the Mind. The Colonial Past and the Politics of the Present. Cambridge University Press. 358 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671702.005
  7. Hadar L. (2023) An EU Pivot to the Middle East. Foreign Policy Research Institute. 08.05. URL: https://www.fpri.org/article/2023/05/an-eu-pivot-to-the-middle-east/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2024).
  8. Jacobs A.L. (2020) Regional and Global Power Competition Deepens Fault Lines Across the Southern Mediterranean. Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, Washington, USA. 24 p. URL: https://agsiw.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Jacobs_Gulf-Influence-in-North-Africa_ONLINE2.pdf (дата обращения: 22.05.2024).
  9. Moser C. (2020) Hard Power Europe? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. No. 80(1). P. 1-12.
  10. Pertusot V. (2016) The European Neighbourhood Policy: A Bureaucratic Phoenix? IFRI, Paris, France. 28 p.
  11. Tasche T. (2010). The Project of a Union for the Mediterranean - Pursuing French Objectives through the Instrumentalisation of the Mare Nostrum. L'Europe en Formation. No. 356(2). P. 53-70. doi: 10.3917/eufor.356.0053
  12. Youngs R. (2015) The EU’s geopolitical crossroads in the Middle East. Policy Brief. No. 127. 8 p.
  13. Ward S. (2021) Decolonization and Neocolonialism. The Oxford World History of Empire. Ed. by P.F. Bang, C.A. Bayly, W. Scheidel. Oxford University Press. P. 1161-1186. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197532768.003.0042
  14. Wezeman P., Gadon J., Wezeman S. (2023) Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2022. SIPRI, Stockholm, Sweden. 12 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55163/CPNS8443

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024